ON November 15, 2012 the Summit on Family Planning in the
Business Sector was held at the Philippine International Convention Center. It
was organized by the British government together with the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, the United Nations Population Fund and a bevy of
multinational pharmaceutical firms. According to reports, this was meant
to exert pressure on Malacañang, which, by the way, does not need any more
pressuring, and Congress to legislate now the most controversial and divisive
Reproductive Health Bill.
During this expensive gathering, local big business
groups, the likes of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI),
Employment Confederation of the Philippines (Ecop), Makati Business Club (MBC),
Management Association of the Philippines (MAP) and Philippine Business for
Social Progress (PBSP), signed a “manifesto of support” for the RH Bill.
The veil that comfortably, albeit deceptively, shrouded a
pro-poor, pro-Filipino and pro-woman campaign which the RH Bill was packaged
and projected to be, suddenly disappeared. This summit has definitely,
though perhaps unconsciously, unmasked the true nature and purpose the RH Bill
supporters, movers and bankrollers.
Militant groups the likes of Akbayan, Gabriela, Diwa,
Bayan Muna and TUCP who during street-marches days detested like a disease
anything foreign or imperialist—and anything “burgis”—have sadly become
co-accessories in the subtle deception that the RH Bill is, to repeat the
cliché, pro-poor, pro-woman and pro-Filipino. The ideological
inconsistency of these left-leaning groups who have now become lackeys of
multinational capitalists and moneyed eugenicists has lent a negative credence
to their RH Bill cause—and perhaps to their other political agenda.
At the other end of the ideological spectrum, the
Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU) believes otherwise. Elmer Labog, KMU chair,
insists: “Big capitalists’ support for the RH Bill stems from their anti-poor
sentiments and greed for profits. They have never shown genuine concern for the
plight of the poor or for women’s reproductive rights…They want to project
themselves as pro-poor but they have consistently rejected calls for a P125
across-the-board wage hike nationwide, for the junking of contractual
employment, and for respect for workers’ rights. They have been demolishing
urban poor communities so they can build their businesses… They want to project
themselves as pro-women, but they have through the years refused to give
maternity benefits to women contractual workers. In many special economic
zones in the country, women contractuals who get pregnant are automatically
booted out from work.”
Foreign lobby and money have been falsely indoctrinating
public opinion about the RH Bill. This Summit has helped clear the deception
that this bill is after all not what it is projected to be. It has cleared,
too, the suspicion why suddenly the wealthy is interested in “helping” the
poor.
And, by the way, RH lapdogs that have been attacking a
Senator for plagiarism should reread the text of the Reproductive Health Bill
and discover that various texts and contexts of this bill have been copied
verbatim from these foreign documents: The 1981 Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW); the 1994
International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD); and the 1995
Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing.
No comments:
Post a Comment