A PALACE functionary was quoted recently
as saying, “The officials of the (CBCP) are apparently out of touch with the
sentiments of the faithful who overwhelmingly support the changes in the
Philippines—turning the nation into a safer place for families, working people,
especially young night shift workers, far from the ‘terror’ the bishops paint
rather dramatically.” This was obviously
a reaction to the pastoral letter on extrajudicial killings read in all
parishes nationwide on February 5.
The
government secretary may actually be right.
The only rub is, he must have based his observation in social media
where the bishops or most church people are irrefutably out of touch. Social media in the country today is heavily
populated by supporters of the Duterte administration. The Mocha Uson Blog alone boasts of 4.7
million followers, as of this writing. That’s definitely way above the “likers”
of mainstream media networks that are also migrating into social media. Without delving into the issue of how they have
exponentially gathered millions of social media content providers and rabid
supporters in so short a time, suffice it to say that this state of things has
made the current dispensation dominate the Philippine socio-political landscape—and,
more significantly, the crafting of public opinion.
To
drive home a more terrifying point, when one, for instance, makes a negative
comment against the Duterte government, which is needed in a healthy democratic
process, expect a relentless bashing that are dished in social media from “ad
hominem” arguments to manufactured “half-truths”. The CBCP has always been a favorite target
of a bashing routine. Since the CBCP is
not keen on correcting conjectures and propaganda pieces, half-truths and wrong perceptions become, in
the long run, “true” in the eyes of the receiving public. The accusation viralling in social media
lately that the reason why CBCP issued a pastoral letter against extra
juridical killings is because of the closure of 23 mining operations, implying
that the Catholic Church has a stake in some of them. This is absolutely false on all counts, of
course. Since no correction was made in
social media, millions of netizens seemingly believe this now as true.
While
admittedly the bishops and their priests are mostly out of touch with the
virtual world of the internet, they are definitely not with the real
world. Being the most immersed servant-leaders
in the country, there is no barrio in the Philippines today that is not covered
by a parish priest. There is simply no
way that these priests will not know the deepest sentiments of their
parishioners. But, of course, there are quite
a few of them who find it hard to live by Pope Francis’ pastoral directive of
becoming “shepherds with the smell of sheep.”
One
does not need mastery in rocket science to know that an average of 35 or so
people killed daily or over 7,000 people murdered in barely 6 months is not a
reign of terror. With not a single case
really investigated or brought to justice or a killing spree fueled, how could
one in his right senses declare that people are safe. If the bishops are out of touch, then so are
Time magazine, New York Times, the BBC and other reputable media outlets who
were ahead of the bishops in reporting this 6-month reign of terror in the
Philippines. If the Palace is right, the
Amnesty International, a Nobel Prize awardee, will belong to the same
“out-of-touch” category.
In
the same statement quoted above, the Palace functionary continues his piece,
“The efforts of these Church leaders might be put to better use in practical
catechetics that build strong moral character among the faithful, and so
contribute more to the reign of peace felt by ordinary citizens everywhere,
especially those who are innocent of illegal activities.” Simply put, this says that exercising
citizen’s democratic right to denounce a wrong in government is not to put ones
lot “to better use.” Also, not to say
something against the murder of over 7,000 poor Filipinos “contribute more to
the reign of peace” and by doing “practical catechesis” without any bit of
relevance to the daily problems on the ground, build “a strong moral
character.”
One
may just exclaim with Roman Senator Cicero of old, not on social media, of
course, for fear of being bashed, “O tempora, O mores!”
No comments:
Post a Comment